The Draft EIA: Whether It Stands The Test of The ‘Precautionary Principle’ And ‘Participatory Governance’?8 min read

BY : NIDHI SINGHAssistant Professor, Amity University, Lucknow

Environment Impact Assessment or EIA is the procedure or study which predicts the impact of a proposed mechanical/infrastructural venture on the habitat. It forestalls the proposed action/venture from being affirmed without appropriate oversight or facing unfavorable results into account. In other words, EIA is a significant modus operandi for assessing the possible natural effect of a proposed venture. It is an approach whereby individuals’ perspectives are mulled over for allowing final assent to any formative undertaking or movement. It is fundamentally, a dynamic device to choose whether the undertaking ought to be affirmed or not. It can be characterized as the examination to anticipate the impact of a proposed activity. A dynamic device, EIA thinks about different choices for an undertaking and looks to recognize the one which speaks to the best blend of monetary and ecological expenses and advantages.


“The EIA procedure was generally formulated to consider the necessities of networks, and ought to be a fastidiously mapped, expand procedure to find out the ecological feasibility of a task. The whole procedure is diminished to a progression of snappy advances that is being satisfied by compromising. This whole system basically doesn’t report the voices of networks that will be legitimately influenced by propose grown ventures. The couple of occasions it does are not many and far in the middle. The reverberating cry of specialists in the field is altogether determined by the questionable “ease of doing business” system. Socially, we are at a disastrous crossroads where business foundation picks up priority over characteristic framework (nature), i.e. air terminals and thruways are esteemed more in contrast with mangroves and biologically delicate territories that are a piece of our way of life and information legacy. The way to deal with “improvement” ought to be base up and there is a critical need to make an empowering democratic based condition that permits individuals to advance their perspectives without the dread of backfire. “

How does it work?

EIA deliberately looks at both helpful and antagonistic results of the undertaking and guarantees that these impacts are considered during venture proposal. It assists with recognizing conceivable natural impacts of the proposed venture, put forwards the measures to moderate antagonistic impacts and predicts whether there will be huge unfavorable ecological impacts, much after the alleviation is executed. By considering the natural impacts of the task and their alleviation right off the bat in the venture planning phase, environmental assessment has numerous advantages, for example, safety prerequisite, ideal use of assets and sparing of time and cost of the venture. Appropriately led EIA additionally diminishes clashes by advancing network support, advising leaders, and helping lay the base for ecologically stable ventures. Advantages of coordinating EIA have been seen in all phases of an undertaking, from investigation and arranging, through development, activities, decommissioning, and past site conclusion.

Draft EIA: Newfangled Now and a Victim of Enigma

India’s new EIA draft has been generally reprimanded for its tricky changes in rules. A large portion of the arrangements in the new draft of EIA ends up being a backward takeoff from the prior rendition.

There are numerous issues with this draft on the ecological and equitable front which has neglected to:

  1. Blanket exemption for strategic projects will pave way for violence on environment with impunity. Environmental degradation does not differentiate between projects. It will affect everyone equally. Suo moto reporting may never happen as there is no responsibility fixing mechanism for damage caused.
  2. Resolve the emergency of inappropriate e-waste management, which effectively affects characteristic biological systems and general wellbeing by deciding not to manage e-waste handling in India.
  3. Consolidate the real factors of the present and the future by excluding ventures, for example, battery producing, production of solar panels, and different parts that are the foundation of the roaring renewable energy sector.
  4. Incorporate Geo-engineering, which is purposeful and enormous scope control of Earth’s characteristic procedures, and is a major supporter of the climate calamity.
  5. Moderating the rundown of ventures that are either absolved from ecological leeway or needn’t bother with open meeting before getting environmental clearance viz.:

Firstly, progressive projects like interstate developments have been absolved from getting prior environmental clearance despite the fact that there are hazards of crumbling of the wildlife habitats and spaces thus the rise of zoonotic infections like COVID-19. Secondly, Projects that encouraged with the incessant reliance on fossil fuel activities like coal bed methane extraction, inland and seaward oil and gas boring, shale gas survey, and extraction are set in the excluded class, despite the fact that they apply an immense cost for nature and are not green.

The draft should be pulled back and discharged at an increasingly appropriate date when individuals are not wrestling with a worldwide pandemic. At the point when it is discharged, it ought to be finished with sufficient time for the formal review time frame. There ought to be more straightforwardness with respect to the reaction individuals give during this period and why it has been actualized or not executed in the last report.

Right off the bat, this draft proposes to abbreviate formal conferences and excluded some enormous ventures from formal conferences itself-incorporates water system, dam works, and so on. Minimized people group who rely upon the land for every one of their needs can in fact lose it without being counseled for ‘vital tasks’. The term vital activities could be anything-it isn’t obviously characterized by any stretch of the imagination! Either this, or there is lesser time for activation and composed dissent due to the shortening of the formal proceeding time frame.

At that point the fait accompli issues come in with the post-facto freedom. The legitimacy for clearances for specific enterprises have expanded more current establishments to undertakings should be possible at considerably more simplicity with less counsel due to the clearances. The consistence report has diminished every year rather than bieneally-which causes even more harm and lesser requirement for tests! This pandemic ought to have been a reminder to reinforce the earth guidelines not weakens it further.


The transition to get rid of individual environmental clearances for ventures inside corporations will prompt feeble fulfillment and adherence to ecological principles by the particular enterprises inside the modern complex. Further, there is no extent of fixing singular responsibility under such conditions meaning ecological infringement are more probable than at any other time to sneak by the radar, thereby, prompting far reaching ecological impairment.

The 2020 draft just hopes to serve the interests of the business network as it curtails the courses of events for getting ecological clearances, builds the legitimacy of mining and riverbed related ventures, gets rid of freedom prerequisites for expansion projects and has extended the avoidance list under which tasks are absolved from getting environmental clearances. As of late/years, we have watched the impacts of a powerless ecological strategy. Mumbai’s Aarey backwoods was cleared to assemble a metro shed in spite of enormous fights. Vizag’s LG Polymers caused a gas spill on seventh May. Assam’s Baghjan gas spill is another ongoing model. In the perspective on current circumstance where we confronted common cataclysms like typhoons because of environmental change, beetle assaults, COVID-19 pandemic this year and a lot increasingly normal and man made catastrophes in the previous not many years, we should make the EIA revisions considerably more grounded to ensure and safeguard our regular assets and use them economically as opposed to weakening it and making it simpler for enterprises to get leeway.

 Also, we ought to have warnings for EIA open remarks on ventures publicized on national TV and national papers for individuals who don’t have web get to or the information to explore through online gateways. Lion’s share of our country/agrarian populace who might be more probable be influenced by numerous modern activities don’t have a clue how to get to the online entries. Before making arrangements online for such significant enactments, we ought to have satisfactory preparing for the general population to utilize these entrances proficiently.


  1. Jayanta Kalita, Lessons from Baghjan, Dehing-Patkai: Assam fears bigger ecological damage from draft EIA, available at
  2. Explained: Reading the draft Environment Impact Assessment norms, and finding the red flags, The Indian express, available at
  3. Dipti Sanjiv, Draft EIA 2020 encourages environmental violations, warn experts, available at
  5. Why draft EIA 2020 needs a revaluation, Down to Earth, available at
  6. Sonal Jain, Draft EIA notification 2020, Whose interest does it secure? , The Leaflet, available at
  8. What are the key changes in the Environment Impact Assessment Notification 2020?, The Hindu, available at
  9. Over 1,600 students write to Centre to withdraw draft EIA, NewIndianExpress, available at