No action to be taken under new Online Gambling law: Karnataka High Court to State2 min read

BY- MAADHAV GOYAL

On Friday, the Karnataka High Court ordered the state government to refrain from pursuing any action under the Karnataka Police (Amendment) Act 2021, which prohibits all forms of online gaming and betting in the state [All India Gaming Federation V. State Of Karnataka].
On October 5, the Amendment Act became law. It prohibits wagering or betting in any form, including tokens with monetary value paid before or after their issuance. Virtual money and electronic fund transfers in relation to any game of chance are also prohibited.
The maximum penalty for violating the Amendment Act is three years in jail and a fine of up to one lakh rupees.
The Court was considering a petition filed by the All Indian Gaming Federation and others challenging the Amendment Act’s legitimacy. The new amendment has also been challenged in the High Court by Junglee Games India Private Limited, Head Digital Works Private Limited (www.a23.com), and Play Games 24×7 Private Limited.
On October 27, Justice Krishna S Dixit said that he will hear all of the applications challenging the Amendment Act.
When the case was heard on Friday, Senior Advocate Arvind Datar, who was representing the petitioners, contended that the Supreme Court had ruled that if there is any degree of skill involved, it is not a gamble. It enters the area of contract law. The Court was advised that if it is solely dependent on chance, it falls within the category of gambling and betting.
According to the petition, the amendment has put a blanket prohibition on all types of skill games including wagering and betting. According to the plea, the Amendment Act broadened the scope of the illegality of online games involving virtual currency and electronic cash transfers.
The petitioners claimed that it had harmed their basic right to freedom to practice any profession or engage in any occupation, trade, or business.
Furthermore, it is claimed that the Act treats ‘online games of skill,’ such as chess and bridge, as unlawful gambling. The petitioners allege that the Amendment Act groups activities that are addressed differently and apart from gaming.
The petitioners urged the Court to declare the Act unconstitutional because it restricts legitimate economic operations in the same way as “illegal gaming activities” are restricted.

READ ALSO: HC: Forensic Report forms the foundation of cases under the NDPS Act and in its absence, the prosecution’s case falls to the ground